Red Light Camera Tickets: November 2011 Archives

November 23, 2011

Petaluma Motorcycle Crackdown - 51 Traffic Tickets Issued

On November 14, 2011, the Petaluma Police Department ran an all day traffic enforcement targeting motorcycle safety. In the end 51 traffic tickets were issued but only one to a motorcyclist.

Among the citations issued by the Petaluma Police Officers were tickets for speeding, cellphone use, illegal U-turns, passing over double yellow lines, running red lights and a pedestrian obstructing traffic. In addition, officers made two arrests, one for drunk driving and one for possession of a controlled substance. The driver arrested for drug possession had been stopped for a cellphone violation and officers allegedly smelled marijuana before conducting a further investigation.

The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution protects us all from unreasonable and warrantless searches and seizures. That protection extends to traffic stops. Police in California can stop a vehicle based on a reasonable belief that a vehicle code violation has occurred and traffic stops are routinely initiated for lighting and mechanical violations as well as for speeding, cell phone usage, illegal turning movements and failure to stop. For an officer to conduct a search of a person or her vehicle without a warrant there must be probable cause to believe a crime has been committed or the officer must have received valid consent from the driver prior to conducting the search.

Continue reading "Petaluma Motorcycle Crackdown - 51 Traffic Tickets Issued" »

November 18, 2011

San Francisco Bay Area Traffic Ticket Results Nov 14-18, 2011

Client charged with violating Vehicle Code 21453, red light camera ticket in Emeryville. Case dismissed at court trial in Oakland, Alameda County Superior Court.

Marin County man alleged to have been driving 71 mph, based on radar, in a 35 mile per hour zone on Nicasio Valley Road. Court trial in the Marin Superior Court. The citing CHP officer failed to produce a valid traffic and engineering survey and the charged violation of Vehicle Code 22350 and court ordered suspended license from prior trial by written declaration are dismissed.

In California the use of Radar or Lidar on most surface streets where the speed limit has been set at prima facie limit the police must produce a valid traffic and engineering survey in order to justify the use of a speed measuring device. According to the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, prima facie speed limits should be set at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85% of all driver's in the survey unless proper legal reasons allow for a reduction below that setting. The use of Radar or Lidar where there is no valid survey amounts to an illegal speed trap.

Continue reading "San Francisco Bay Area Traffic Ticket Results Nov 14-18, 2011" »